Skip to content
Every tutorial here is 100% free — and always will be
LSLovableStudent

How do I make Lovable perform a security review without changing anything?

Last checked 31 Aug 2026

Short answer

Explicitly tell Lovable to run in read-only review mode — ask it to report findings only and not touch any code, then decide what to fix yourself.

Why you need to say it explicitly

By default, Chat and Build mode in Lovable will act on requests — if you ask it to "check for security issues" it may start fixing things as it finds them, which can change working behaviour you didn't want touched. To get a pure report, you need to say so clearly, and ideally use Plan mode, which is designed to think through and describe changes before any code is written.

How to do it

  1. Switch to Plan mode if you want a discussion-first pass with no code execution at all.

  2. In Chat, be explicit:

    Do a full security review of this project. Check RLS policies on every table, look for exposed secrets in front-end code, and check that admin-only actions are enforced server-side. Report every issue you find with the affected file or table, but do not change or fix anything yet.

  3. Read the report, then decide which fixes to apply — either one at a time, or batch the safe ones together.

  4. If you do want fixes applied, ask for them individually and check the diff before accepting.

What to expect back

A useful review names each finding, the affected table/file, why it's a risk, and the fix — not just "looks secure" or a wall of generic advice.

What usually goes wrong

  • Asking a vague "is this secure?" — you'll often get a shallow answer. Ask for the specific checks (RLS, secrets, admin permissions, dependency risk) by name.
  • Forgetting that Build mode messages consume the same credit balance as other tasks even if you only wanted a report — Plan mode is worth using here.
  • Applying every suggested fix in one go and then struggling to tell which change broke something if a regression appears; fix and re-test incrementally instead.

See also /questions/how-do-i-check-a-lovable-project-for-security-vulnerabilities for the built-in automated scan alongside this manual review.

Sources

Was this answer helpful?

Related questions

Website made, maintained and hosted by PromptSites.com

PromptSites logo